Hi Rory,
     
    I used George F. Black's Surnames of Scotland, Their 
    Origin, Meaning and History as the basis for my article, as I'm sure 
    was obvious.  George Fraser Black (1866-1948) held a PhD, and the above 
    book was published in 1946.  Surnames of Scotland, of course, 
    has become the most authoritative source for Scottish surnames.  This 
    view is held by Sharon L. Krossa, whom I also used as a source.  Ms. 
    Krossa is affiliated with Aberdeen University and maintains a website called 
    "Scottish Names 101" at
    
     
    I then used the LDS church's database of Scottish Church 
    Records as a means of sorting and collating information, while I also had 
    available to me on microfilm the original, hand-written parish 
    registers.  Through the use of these, I was able to document the 
    transition of the name and "prove" (as far as possible at this 
    point in time) George F. Black's statements regarding Argyll 
    Sinclairs.
     
    Whether they were shinglers or tinklers is not terribly 
    important--what is important is that the Argyll Sinclairs (and those in the 
    Western Isles) had roots in the Clan mac na cearda (gaelic).  The Scots 
    form of this name was McNokaird, and from approximately 1685-1750 the use of 
    McNokaird made its transition to the English Sinclair.  I believe it's 
    important for Sinclairs who trace their roots back to Argyll to have this 
    information.  However, I'm sure that not every single Sinclair 
    in Argyll were McNokairds--some undoubtedly originated in the traditional 
    Sinclair locales.
     
    I agree with you that under the Restoration of the Clans 
    promoted by Robert Burns, Sir Walter Scott, Prince Albert and Queen Victoria 
    from 1790-1820, all Sinclairs can unite under the current Clan and Tartan 
    with pride!
     
    I appreciate your interest and your 
    comments.
     
    Karen Matheson
     
    
        
        Hi Karen: 
        Just read your 
        McNokaird article and a nice piece of work it is.  
        Congratulations!  It is really very good.
        I would add as a codicil to your thesis, 
        however,  the following:
             Alexander 
        MacLean Sinclair was an amazingly well-connected, well-respected scholar 
        both in English and in Gaelic. His work was published both here and in 
        Scotland at  the turn of the century (His 500 page tome on the 
        MacLeans is still in use today) and it is a remarkable achievement when 
        one also considers that the man grew up on an impoverished farm in one 
        of the poorest counties in Nova Scotia (still is).  This does not 
        mean that he could not be wrong nor does it mean that we do not have new 
        information that he did not possess.  But......I do not have the 
        Gaelic and I do not know if you do but it would be nervy of me to 
        contradict Professor Sinclair (a native Gaelic speaker and Gaelic 
        academician) even 100 years after the fact and  state categorically 
        "The Sinclairs of Argyll were not shinglers".  
        Similarly,  I will not argue with your thesis that they must have 
        been smiths.  "Craftmen" or "people of the 
        craft" I would like to think might include shinglers and if you 
        don't think there's an art to shingling, try doing your own roof next 
        time it needs one. There is veritable skill in roofing and I should 
        know, I am a contractor and I value my roofers as my 
        brothers.    
        Professor Sinclair, I think would agree with your 
        general thesis that the Argyll Sinclairs are a different "kettle of 
        fish" and the proof of that is his statement that they are 
        "out-and-out Highlanders".  My opinion is, as I have said 
        elsewhere, that a connection may well be there between the 
        Rosslyn-Caithness Sinclairs and those of Argyll but that opionion and 5 
        cents would have bought you a coffee in 1946.  Whatever the truth 
        of the connection or not, our Argyll brothers and sisters are members of 
        our family and nothing can change that. 
        Juli's remark is on the money when in response to 
        "Sinclair's by mistake"  she responds that, looked at 
        another way,  Norman Sinclairs have no claim to be 
        Highland.
         
        Yours 
        aye,                             
        Rory
         
        
            -----Original 
            Message-----
From: Matheson <zoo@uswest.net>
To: 
            Mailing List Sinclair <sinclair@jump.net>
Date: 
            Monday, May 10, 1999 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: Sinclairs by 
            mistake?
 
            John,
             
            I believe that is exactly what this means!  
            However, after the restoration of the clans and the return of the 
            "romance" of the Scots from about 1790-1820ish, Sinclairs 
            from everywhere can unite and claim affiliation with the Sinclair 
            Clan (I believe). :)
             
            Sinclairs in Argyll were not 
            "shinglers."  For more 
            information, read my article "McNokairds: The Early Sinclairs 
            of Argyll" found on the websites maintained by both Paul 
            Sinclair (http://kingcrest.com/sinclair) 
            and John Quarterman (www.mids.org/sinclair/) 
            under Argyll "Origin of Argyll Sinclairs." 
             
            Karen Matheson
            
                
Alexander Sinclairs book 
                states     
>    
                The Gaelic form of the name Sinclair is Singlear.  The 
                Sinclairs of
>Argyleshire call themselves Clann-na-Cearda 
                or the Children of the craft or
>trade.  It is 
                probable that the name was given them by their neighbours 
                >would
naturally take for gratned that Singlear meant 
                shingler or >flax-dresser.  The
Sinclairs of Argyll 
                are out-and -out Highlanders. > 
Forgive me for being 
                obtuse but does this mean that argyle Sinclairs may have
no 
                real clain to be descended from the Norman/Scandiavian 
                Sinclairs?
Yours Aye
john
[ This is the 
                Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net.
[ To 
                get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html