Re: testing a new discussion site idea-please read this

[milamba <milamba@milamba.com>]

Hello Donald, :)

Don't worry - I haven't given up!  Is genealogy something you *can* easily 
give up?  :):)

But I do have a question for you!  Andrew Sinclair and Charlotte Calder 
have always been listed (by us at least) as having the following children...

Elizabeth (Betsy)?? Nov 57
David 30 Sep 59
George - 16 Jul 61
James 17 may 63
John 16 Apr 65
Andrew (my ggrandfather) 23 May 67
Barbara 21 Jan 70
Charlotte 18 April 72
Donald 4 April 74
Emmie (Amelia) 25 May 76

Now this is what I've always accepted.  However, just recently I obtained a 
copy of the 1891 Census and they list Amelia as a GRANDDAUGHTER!!!!  Living 
in the house, along with Charlotte and several other strangers, but 
Charlotte is listed as a daughter and Amelia as a granddaughter.   Have you 
heard this before? Do you have any thoughts on it?  I wondered if perhaps 
she really was a granddaughter and the child of Betsy - perhaps outside 
marriage? Everything else seems to be right and her age is correct...

Would love to hear your thoughts on this... and if you don't have a copy of 
this entry I'd be happy to either scan it and email it or mail you over a 
photocopy!

Regards
Margaret :)

At 06:37 PM 5/22/99 -0400, you wrote:

>Dear Margaret,
>                      Don't give up, I'm still looking, it's got to be
>somewhere in my files. You shall be notified immediately it comes to the fore.
>                       All the best,  Donald.
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net.
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html

[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net.
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html