----- Original Message ----- 
  
  
  Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 7:10 PM
  Subject: Sinclair of Caithness 
  
                      
  Sinclair of Caithness  
  
                        
  The Wicked Earls
     The Sinclair family, which claims 
  descent from the Saint-Clair family of Normandy, at first settled at Roslin in 
  Midlothian, where a branch remains to this day. It was the marriage of Sir 
  (Prince) Henry St Clair to the heiress of the Earl of Stratherne, Caithness 
  and Orkney that brought it the northern lands with which it is more commonly 
  associated. Sir Henry conquered the Faeroe Islands in 1391 and explored 
  Greenland, and it is also claimed that he sailed as far as North America, 
  landing in what became Nova Scotia and Massachusetts long before Columbus was 
  born. In 1455 William Sinclair was created Earl of Caithness, and it was 
  around this time that the northern branch of the family adopted that 
  spelling.
     The Sinclairs were long a warlike clan, 
  for, through marriage, they had Viking blood in them. George Sinclair, fourth 
  Earl of Caithness, was a noted warmonger, described in William Anderson s The 
  Scottish Nation (1859—63) as ‘a cruel and avaricious nobleman, who scrupled 
  not at the commission of the greatest crimes for the attainment of his 
  purposes . He succeeded as the earl and clan chief in 1529, when his 
  grandfather was killed trying to claim his right to the Orkney Islands, and in 
  1545 resigned his earldom of Caithness to James V, who granted a new charter 
  in favour of George s eldest son, John, Master of Caithness, with remainder to 
  his heirs male and assigns.
     When the Bishop of 
  Caithness was banished to England, George Sinclair and his friend Donald 
  Mackay of Reay laid claim to the bishop s lands, and collected rent from the 
  tenants (they claimed to be collecting it on the bishop s behalf, but he was 
  never to receive a penny of it). Mackay also appropriated the bishop s 
  residence of Skibo Castle, and Sinclair his other castle of Strabister. When 
  the Bishop was later restored to office, both Mackay and Sinclair refused to 
  give up the castles, and they were summoned to the court .at Helmsdale, where 
  the Lieutenant-General for northern Scotland the Earl of Huntly) and the Earl 
  of Sutherland were to question hem. Mackay refused to attend, and was 
  subsequently arrested and held prisoner in the Munros  castle of Foulis 
  until his escape in 1549, but George Sinclair seems to have acted out of 
  character, for not only did he go to Helmsdale, he risked life and limb to do 
  so. The Helmsdale River was in full spate, but Sinclair forced his way across 
  n foot against water that came as high as his chest. His attendance meant that 
  he was able to come to an arrangement with the two Earls, and he was free to 
  return to Caithness.
     ln July 1555 Mary Queen of 
  Scots came to Inverness to try to establish order among the northern clans. 
  George Sinclair was commanded to appear before her, along with many of his 
  clansmen, in order to swear loyalty to her. Sinclair went alone and, for 
  failing to bring his men with him, was imprisoned as a possible nuisance at 
  Inverness. He was later transferred to Aberdeen, then Edinburgh, before 
  finally being freed on payment of a large fine. On 15 December 1556 he was 
  granted a remission for his ‘crime .
     In 1566 
  Sinclair became justiciar of Caithness, which gave him the power to condemn or 
  pardon any crime committed in that county, apart from treason, and in 1567 he 
  was the Chancellor of the jury that tried the Earl of Bothwell and acquitted 
  him of murdering Lord Darnley. (It is worth noting that Bothwell s sister, 
  Lady Jean Hepburn, was Sinclair s daughter-in-law!). Between 1566, when he 
  acquired the Barony of Mey from the Bishop of Caithness, and 1572 George built 
  the Castle of Mey  four storeys high and virtually square in plan, with a 
  flat roof and bartizans at the corners. The castle now belongs to Queen 
  Elizabeth, the Queen Mother.
     George Sinclair s 
  summons to Helmsdale had given him a deep hatred of John Gordon, Earl of 
  Sutherland. He had long planned revenge, and it is claimed that he instigated 
  his cousin to poison the Earl. In July 1567 the Earl and his wife were invited 
  by Gilbert and Isobel Gordon to a meal at Helmsdale Castle, or hunting lodge. 
  During the supper wine was brought from the cellars, and Isobel made sure the 
  Earl and Countess drank plenty. They fell ill during the night, and next 
  morning, were taken back to Dunrobin Castle, where they died within five 
  days.
     The Earl s  heir, Alexander, who had 
  returned late from hunting, was thus lucky enough to escape the poisonings but 
  Gilbert Gordon s heir was not so fortunate. He was in the kitchens of the 
  castle and asked for a drink; a servant, unaware that poison had been added to 
  the wine, gave him some — and he died within two 
  days.
     The similarity in the appearance of the 
  three corpses raised the suspicions of the Earl s family, and Isobel Gordon 
  was apprehended and sent to Edinburgh where she was tried and found guilty of 
  the murders. She was sentenced to be hanged on the gallows, but died on the 
  morning the execution was due to take place.
     Some 
  say that George Sinclair was the real culprit. This seemed to be confirmed 
  when he took young Alexander Gordon, the heir to the Sutherland estates, into 
  his guardianship and forcibly married him to his daughter, Barbara Sinclair — 
  who, at 32, was more than twice the lad s age. He also took up residence in 
  Dunrobin Castle, but paid no respect to the Sutherland belongings, burning 
  their old papers. If Alexander Sutherland was poorly treated by his wife and 
  father-in-law, at least he was not subjected to the treatment that Sinclair 
  meted out to the Sutherland tenants; many were banished from their homes, and 
  not a few were put to death. Ultimately, though, the Murrays of Dornoch 
  persuaded the young Sutherland to flee to Aberdeen — they suspected that 
  George Sinclair was planning to murder Alexander also, and marry off his 
  sister, Lady Margaret Gordon, to George s second son William 
  Sinclair.
     When George Sinclair found out who had 
  persuaded Alexander to escape from Dunrobin a feud with the Murrays ensued. In 
  1570 George and his eldest son, John Garbh (or ‘strong John ), the Master of 
  Caithness and husband of Lady Jean Hepburn, took a large party of men to 
  attack Hugh Murray, the chieftain of that family, at Dornoch. With them was 
  lye (or Y) Dubh, 13th Chief of Mackay. They made their way into the town, 
  destroyed a number of buildings, plundered the town s riches, and set fire to 
  the cathedral; the Murrays took refuge in Dornoch Castle, where they managed 
  to hold out for a week. In the end an agreement was reached — the Murrays gave 
  up three hostages in return for their safe passage out of Sutherland and John 
  Sinclair and lye Mackay allowed them to retreat across the Moray 
  Firth.
     George Sinclair, however, refused to accept 
  his son's treaty with the Murrays, and in his anger had the three hostages 
  beheaded. He thought that John had let him down, for he had every opportunity 
  to kill all the Murrays. Realising how furious his father was, John made his 
  escape and went to live with the chief of Mackay. George thought this was 
  suspicious and began to think that his son was plotting to overthrow him — 
  which may have been true. He sent messengers from Caithness to the Mackay s 
  castle with requests for a reconciliation, but most of these were ignored. At 
  length, though, the Master of Caithness decided it was safe enough to return 
  home. He met his father at Girnigoe Castle, near Wick, but while the pair were 
  talking armed men rushed in and captured John. He was locked up in the lowest 
  vault of the castle. Not only did his father lock the vault door, but he had 
  his heir fastened to the walls with iron chains, locked with padlocks. Above 
  this dungeon vault were two other vaults, used as 
  guard-rooms.
     The Master of Caithness knew that his 
  father was a wild man, and realised that he was angry with him for making 
  peace with his enemy behind his back, but he did not reckon on just how long 
  his father s anger would last. He thought that after a day or two he would be 
  set free, having been taught a lesson, but his father kept him imprisoned for 
  six years!
     George s second son, William of Mey, 
  seems to have spent a good deal of his time in the vault, tormenting his elder 
  brother. One of his spells of goading was so evil that the Master of Caithness 
  managed to reach his brother and kill him. He was then kept prisoner at 
  Girnigoe by other relatives, David and Ingram Sinclair, who brought about his 
  death. At first they kept him without food for a number of days, while 
  tormenting him with the smell of cooking coming from another vault. After a 
  few days they offered their famished prisoner some beef —but beef that had 
  been salted in barrels ready for winter consumption. John Garbh, not 
  unnaturally, ate the beef, but was then refused water. He died on 15 March 
  1576 and was buried in Wick church.
     George 
  Sinclair died in Edinburgh on 9 September 1582, and was interred in the 
  ancient burial vault of Roslin Chapel. His heart was removed from his corpse 
  before the burial and carried north to be buried in a lead casket in the kirk 
  at Wick, in much the same way as Robert the Bruce s heart was buried at 
  Melrose Abbey. The story did not end there, however, for in 1588 one of his 
  old enemies of the Sutherland clan broke into the church and had the heart, 
  which had turned to dust, scattered in the strong winds which blow across the 
  flat moors of Caithness. George was succeeded by John Garbh s son, George (d. 
  1643) who became the fifth Earl. The violent streak in the Sinclairs seems to 
  have touched him too, for he was known as ‘the wicked earl . He had the 
  gaolers who imprisoned his father executed — although in 1584 he received a 
  remission under the Great Seal of the Privy Council, so the Council must have 
  felt that his act was at least partially justified. The fifth Earl was the man 
  behind the minting of illegal coinage.