[Up]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
RE: Niven
At 18:16 23/03/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Niven
>
>Just when I was all fired up to research my Sinclair family you write:
>
>"We have also to keep in mind the paragenetic Sinclairs i.e. those who, by
>reason for the absurd custom of women taking their husbands' names on
>marriage, give birth to children of a different name although the
>matrilineal genes are invariably the stronger and certainly the more
>authentic."
>Now I have a problem - does this make me a Sinclair purely by name.
>My mother was a Mackay and her mother a Campbell, my paternal grandmother a
>Weir.
>We can't have our cake and eat it - can we?
>Regards
>Bryan Sinclair
>
>I seem to have stirred up a bit of trouble by suggesting that the
>matrilineal gene
is as strong and frequently stronger than that of the male. However,
there are
certain powerful traits which can never be eradicated. As you are
aware, I am
constantly reminding people that that which is born in the bone can
never be
driven out of the blood. For example, you can cross a Hereford cow with a
black Angus bull, or vice versa, but you will never get rid of the
white face of the
Hereford. It is the dominant trait.
With the Sinclairs, the dominant trait is to be bloody-minded. If you
are bloody-
minded then your genes have not been irreparably diluted with your
McKay and
Campbell ancestry.
Elsewhere on this Discussion List, Donald (Hempriggs) has listed a
number of
other Sinclair characteristics which I can identify with
immediately. We are not
the easiest people in the World to get on with but we get things done.
To deplore the loss of a woman's maiden name when she marries, is not the
same as suggesting that her children should take her name but it would be a
good idea (as frequently happens) if it could be added as a 'middle'
name. This
would remind the children (if reminding is necessary) that they have
diverse roots
which bring hybrid strength.
My own mother was a Niven (hence Niven), my grandmother was a Sutherland,
my great grandmother was a Gunn, my g.g.grandmother was a McKay (as with
Bryan Sinclair) and my g.g.g.grandmother was a Calder which, at the
last census,
made me related to 80% of the Caithness population which (as I have
explained
on more than one occasion) is why I live in London!!!!! Ibn Saud, the
founder of
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia said: "Akaribi ni akrab" which, apart from
being a
beautiful piece of alliteration, means 'relatives are scorpions' . The
main threat
to his Kingdom came from his relatives rather than from his enemies.
Incompatibility with one's relatives is just as important as
compatibility with
others. If we didn't branch out there would be far too great a danger
of in-breeding
with all the problems of consanguinity. Never despair when you find
your relatives
are being impossible. It's Nature's way of ensuring the 'diaspora' of
families. It's
no accident that we find Sinclairs everywhere. We are just too bloody
minded to
live together.
I speak from experience> I live alone with my dog.
Niven Sinclair
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Niven Sinclair [SMTP:niven@niven.co.uk]
>Sent: 23 March 2000 14:33
>To: sinclair@mids.org
>Subject: Re: Niven
>
> << File: ATT00001.htm >> At 13:30 23/03/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >Is the book "St Clairs of the Isles" relevant only to
> >the the St Clairs or is it also relevant to Sinclairs as well?
> >In your fascinating statement a few weeks ago that there are
> >15 branches of Sinclair that eventuate from the Orkneys, how
> >many of these are covered in the above Book?
> >
> >Mark Anderson
> >Cape Town
>
>
>Sinclairs/St Clairs/St Clares/Sinklar/Sinkler/St Clare/St Claro/St Clayr/St
>Cler
>and any of the other 70 variants have all been found as one researches for
>information.
>
>It is all the same family.
>
>We have also to keep in mind that many Sinclairs eventually adopted the
>name of their holdings to differentiate them from the other Sinclairs
>around.
>My own grandfather was always known as David Lappan and, of course,
>the present Earl of Caithness, is known as Malcolm Caithness rather than
>Malcolm Sinclair.
>
>In this way, the Sinclairs of Stapleton in Somerset eventually became known
>as Stapletons and, because of the tendency of Sinclairs to produce
>daughters
>rather than male heirs, much of their property (particularly in England)
>went
>over to the Gages, the Lowells, the Coles etc. who all benefited largely
>from
>marrying Sinclair heiresses.
>
>When I eventually 'retire' , I intend to write about the Sinclairs of
>England
>because, with our pre-occupation with all things Scottish, we tend to
>forget
>about the European dimension of the Sinclairs. From the "St Clairs of the
>Isles" we read:
>
> "All that was highest in marriage, lands, or office
> they had in England for nearly a Century after the
> Conquest, and the glow of their fame, and their
> physical and intellectual powers kept them high for
> centuries afterwards in a way rare to any one
> particular lineage".
>
>We have also to keep in mind the paragenetic Sinclairs i.e. those who,
>by reason for the absurd custom of women taking their husbands' names
>on marriage, give birth to children of a different name although the
>matrilineal genes are invariably the stronger and certainly the more
>authentic.
>
>During my own 30 years in Africa I stayed mainly in the Southern Province
>of (what is now) Tanzania where the tribes followed the matrilineal custom
>e.g. the Chief's son was not the next Chief. That honour fell to the
>Chief's
>sister's son.
>
>After all "it is a wise man who knows his own father".
>
>Regards
>
>Niven
>
>
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
- References:
- RE: Niven
- From: Bryan Sinclair <bryan.sinclair@cwcom.net>