Dear Lenna 
  Now the agony of the protracted American election is over. I owe you an 
  apology. Cattiness should not have invaded in my remarks about Swedish 
  democracy. I understand the position of your king as the head of State, not 
  goverment, it is the common form of our British Goverment and most of the 44 
  Commonweal countries.
  Ordinary men unschooled in the law can rise above their bourgeois 
  predilections and fill the dreadful role of giving judgment in jury trials. 
  
  Jurors don't always perform admirably, but the myth of a jury's ultimate 
  fairness usually inspires its members to act accordingly. A myth is useful, 
  and the politicians who  tampered with democratic myths made fools of 
  themselves.
  The repercussions of the American election would have been different if 
  Katherine Harris, Florida's Republican secretary of state, had risen to her 
  larger responsibilities as simple jurors generally do. The denouement would 
  have less rancour and litigation had she played to the myth of popular 
  democracy rather than the lust for partisan victory. Nobody could have faulted 
  her for making sure there was time for a full, fair and careful count.
  The myths of democracy are not delusions, they may be just part of the 
  truth, or embellishments of an inner reality in American culture's creed. 
  Coupled with the American freedom to expose their flaws, the myths have power, 
  they celebrate the powerful ideas that government belongs to the people, that 
  voting is a common right, that all citizens are equal, that they are governed 
  by the rule of law, that minority views are protected no matter how abhorrent 
  to the majority.
  A system of self-government cannot run on skepticism and conflict alone; it 
  needs for people to believe in it. Belief is what ambitious political party 
  adherents put at risk as they try to win instead of trying to learn the will 
  of the people.
  Democratic myths are difficult to explain their vitality depends on 
  something intangible--not just on free speech or the separation of powers, but 
  also on the sense of the American system is a moral enterprise. The closest 
  thing the United States had to a state religion is constitutional democracy. 
  It is no accident that Americans sometimes use religious vocabulary to 
  describe their sacred right to vote and their scriptural efforts to convert 
  other peoples according to the gospel of political pluralism.
  The post-election turbulence was a Rorschach test, a democracy messy enough 
  to invite anarchy and a democracy stable enough to ensure order, a system 
  susceptible to manipulation and one that tries to guarantees fairness. 
  Countries whose myths are false lose them, sooner or later. It happened to 
  the Soviet Union, when Communist myths were gradually eroded until hardly 
  anybody believed them. They were then swept away by the spate of truth-telling 
  that commenced under Mikhail Gorbachev. Left behind now is a terrible vacuum 
  of faith that nurtures new forms of exploitation and authoritarianism.
  Strength lies in disputes, which prevent one or another interest from 
  dominating. Be scrappy and contentious without trying to destroy those who 
  disagree. We  must remain bound together by the myths, of family, of 
  democracy and of fairness.  We can choose our friends, we can not choose 
  our family.  The myth that those who share either our blood or our dream 
  make us love, even if we do not like, the members of this extended family 
  close at hand or in far off lands.
  Self-government is not only as a gritty non-fiction work of squalid facts 
  it is also poetry.
  Nollaig Chridheil agus Bliadhna Mhath Ur