|
Our Titles
From: Malcolm Caithness
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 07:53:02 +0100
Our titles are very confusing but as I understand it the history is as
follows. The first Earl was Rognvald in 871 and he was of the Norse line.
The history is a little confused at times but the Earldom was in the Athol
line, the Angus line and the Stratherne line before becoming the Sinclair
line. It is important to remember that for much of this period
Caithness
was ruled by
Norway
not
Scotland
which accounts for some of the difficulties. In
1455
William St. Clair, Earl of Orkney
(still ruled by Norway) was granted
the Earldom of Caithness by King James II of Scotland by letters patent and
thus became the 1st Earl but was the 39th holder of the title. George IV was
the sixth Earl under Scottish law but the forty fourth holder of the title.
Malcolm Caithness
Clan Chief
|
Earls of Caithness
See also Laurel Fechner's web pages with
details for each Earl.
From: Niven Sinclair <niven@niven.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 09:03:42 +0100
George IV
was indeed the 6th Sinclair Earl of Caithness but the 44th Earl
overall.
Caithness
is the oldest comitial dignity having existed for more then a millennium.
The Sinclairs (as such) did not obtain the earldom until 1454 when it was
granted
to Earl
William Sinclair, the grandson of
Prince Henry Sinclair.
He was the 39th
Earl of Caithness and held the Earldom between 1454 and 1476 (he transferred
the title before his death).
Thereafter, it went to Earl William's son, William by Marjorie Sutherland
(even although
he had had an earlier son, also called William, by his first wife,
Elizabeth Douglas).
This William fell at Flodden
in 1513 when the Earldom passed to his son:
John III, the 41st Earl who held it between 1513 - 1529 was succeeded by
his second son,
George, because his first son, William had died before him. This George,
known as George II
reigned between 1529-1582 but, once more his eldest son, John, pre-deceased
him so the
title passed to his third son, George III who held the title between
1582-1643. (His second
son William had also pre-deceased him).
As his son and grandson also pre-deceased him, the title passed to his
great grandson,
George IV
(1643-1676) who, as I have said was the 44th Earl of Caithness
but only the
6th Sinclair Earl to hold that title.
George V of Keiss
was the 45th Earl of Caithness but he, too, died without issue so the
title passed to his second cousin, Sir John Sinclair of Murkle.
I appreciate it is all very confusing particularly when there is (rarely) a
direct father to son
transfer.
Niven Sinclair
|
Caithness and Orkney Earldoms
From: Niven Sinclair <niven@niven.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 21:53:06 +0100
I have never been able to put a date when the actual transfer of
Caithness
from
Norway
to
Scotland
actually took place because the various Earls (of the
Norse, Atholl, Angus, Stratherne,
and St Clair lines) held lands in
Orkney, Norway and Scotland.
For example, in 1320 we find Earl Magnus of Orkney (which included
Caithness) subscribing
the famous letter to the Pope
asserting the independence of Scotland although he was a Norse Earl.
Although Magnus was not present at the
Battle of Bannockburn
which was fought on St John's Day 1314,
Halcro of that Ilk commanded 300 men from Orkney and fought like
a hero. He
returned to Orkney with great honour in commemoration of which there is a
yearly lighting of
bon-fires at every farm steading in Orkney on St John's Day when the
islands are covered in
a pall of smoke. (It is not generally realised that Bruce sought refuge in
Orkney during 1306.
His sister had married King Eric of Norway Eric's second marriage).
It should also be remembered that the Norse obtained Orkney after a battle
with
Constantine,
the King of the Scots. The present earl is a direct descendant of both
Thorstein and Sigurd who
acquired the earldom in 871 after defeating Constantine.
Caithness also included Sutherland until the murder of John, the 24th Earl,
in 1231 when it
became detached from Orkney and Caithness.
Nevertheless, the three earldoms of Orkney, Caithness and Stratherne were
still held by Malise II
(1333-1344) who died without male issue when Orkney was given to son-in-law
Erengisle Sunesson
whilst Caithness was given to another son-in-law Alexander de Ard. The
Earldom of Stratherne (which
had to go to direct male issue i.e father to son) reverted to the Scottish
Crown. It wasn't until
1379 that
Prince Henry St Clair
(another son-in-law) obtained the
'jarldom' of Orkney minus Caithness
which Alexander de Ard had resigned to the Scottish Crown in 1375. He died
without issue and,
as we know, it was eventually given to Prince Henry's grandson,
Earl William St Clair
in 1554
an unpardonable and inexplicable delay of 110 years before it came to the
rightful hereditary heir.
However, in the interim, the St Clairs were making their influence felt.
We find Henry's brother, John, in
Orkney in 1369 and, as early as 1321
Henry de St Clair,
a great grandfather of Prince Henry St Clair is
appointed ballivus of Caithness by the Scottish King and ballivus of Orkney
by the Norwegian King.
In 1364, a Thomas St Clair (the uncle of Prince Henry) is appointed
ballivus of Orkney in the
absence of Prince Henry St Clair at the Danish Court where he was in
attendance between 1363 to 1365.
Henry was 'betrothed' to Florentia, a Danish Princess, but as she died
before reaching puberty they were never bedded.
However, his brother John, married Ingeborg, the natural daughter of King
Waldemar of Denmark.
John was a brilliant diplomatist and soldier. He took part in the Battle of
Otterburn in 1388 with his cousin,
another Sir John Sinclair of Hermandston. When James, Earl of Douglas, was
killed the banner was
picked up by John Sinclair who gave the Douglas war cry and charged the
enemy. Therafter, it was
said that the battle was won by a dead man but it was Sir John Sinclair who
carried the banner.
But back to Orkney........
The delay in appointing
Henry St Clair
to the 'jarldom' of Orkney is one of those inexplicable mysteries
because he was by far the most able contender for that title. Alexander de
Ard and Erengisle Sunesson
were the other applicants. They were both from Sweden and had neither the
flare nor the knowledge to
govern the islanders who were in the main the offspring of Viking renegades
who had been expelled from
their own country. Furthermore, Prince Henry St Clair had a special
relationship with Queen Margrette
who had only been 10 years of age when she married King Haakon VI of
Norway. On the death of the
King (when their son, Olaf, was only 5 years of age) he, being her premier
'jarl' by virtue of his descent from
from the House of More, became her right-hand-man.
As you know, I have
just returned from Norway
where I was following in the
footsteps of Colonel George
Sinclair just, as in previous years, I had followed in the footsteps of
Prince Henry St Clair so that I might
better understand the country they traversed and the people they met
(making due allowance for the
changes which have taken place in the intervening years).
As aye,
Niven
Last changed: 00/01/10 21:10:10
|